Wednesday Mourning

  Witch’s Will For A Morning In November

My Pick of the Litter Today

The Media’s Benghazi Scandal

By Peter Wehner

Over my career, I’ve tended to resist press bashing. Part of the reason for that may be that there are plenty of journalists whose work I respect and whom I’ve come to admire. But I must say that the way the press as an institution covered the 2012 presidential election was in many respects depressing—and in some respects its biases have rarely been more fully on display.

There are a dozen examples I could cite, but let me simply focus on one: The September 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi. We witnessed a massive failure at three different stages. The first is that the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, and others asked for additional protection because of their fears of terrorist attacks. Those requests were denied—and Mr. Stevens became the first American ambassador to be murdered in more than 30 years, along with three others. The second failure was not assisting former Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty when they were under attack (both were killed). The third failure was that the administration misled the American people about the causes of the attack long after it was clear to many people that their narrative was false.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/11/20/the-medias-benghazi-scandal/

 I cannot agree with Wehner about Karl Rove’s “goodness” but that’s a minor thing. And since he “knows” Rove personally he is in a better position to judge him as a man and not as a public figure. I agree with him that the presstitutes obsession with bringing Rove down was disgusting and disgraceful. As is their attempt to help in the cover-up of the Benghazi failure by the Administration they elected for a second term.

Add that idiot Joan Walsh’s voice to the mix as she calls those who question any who demand answers from Susan Rice cowards. Funny how narrowly she applys that word.

When Sarah Palin was being attacked, viciously and repeatedly, Walsh was silent. She is only one of the reasons I so often feel ashamed to be a woman. A howling, lying, stupid, biased ugly woman inside and out. No wonder she and little Chrissy McTingles are such buds. He is enough to make any man, real man, ashamed of his gender too.

    Stories/Articles You Might Find Interesting – or not

Too Few Oppressors, Too Many Victims

 by Victor Davis Hanson

Since the election, some fatalistic Washington conservative elites have accepted — and Obama operatives have rejoiced in — a supposedly new and non-white-male ethnic electorate:  Americans will be categorized, and collectively so, on the basis of largely how they look and, to a lesser extent, how they sound. Republicans, then, better get with the new tribalism and remarket themselves to address the new minority monolith.

Accordingly, the enlightened and redeemable liberal elements of the otherwise now played-out old white majority, when combined with the new ethnic minorities, will result in a permanent progressive majority — one that rejects the archaic, if not toxic, racialist values that have been in the past so injurious to the idea of what the United States might have otherwise become. Just imagine a better world with no more required reading of white male Greeks, no more inordinate focus on Shakespeare’s Shylock, no need to suffer through Twain’s N-word or Tolkien’s stereotypical dark-skinned orcs — or indeed, the one-dimensional and boring world we inherited from a Jefferson, Madison, Melville, Lincoln, Grant, Edison, Bell, TR, Salk, Nimitz, and Ike.

You Are a Nobody without Your Tribe

Yet the new emphasis on tribe is not necessarily a liberal vision. It ignores all human individuality and assumes that friendships, marriages, and alliances will not dare trump racial and ethic solidarity. Ours is now instead a Galadriel’s mirror of the Balkans, of India’s castes, of Rwanda, but no longer of a multiracial melting-pot America, where our allegiances were to be political, economic, and cultural and not necessarily synonymous with how we looked. Obama’s identity politics would create a Frankenstein of patched-together victims, and yet he will rue that it is a different story to use such a creature for constructive purposes. Such monsters are quite valuable when running for office, but can turn on their masters when it is time to govern.

http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/too-few-oppressors-too-many-victims/?singlepage=true

 Obama Could Show Leadership on State of Black Families

By Jonah Goldberg

President Obama has several stated ambitions for his presidency. He wants it to be “transformative.” He wants to unite Americans of all parties. He wants to build an economy from the middle class out (whatever that means), and he wants to help what you might call the domestic refugees of America’s economic transformation.

Given the principled disagreements dividing left and right in America, it’s hard to see how he can accomplish these goals when it comes to conventional economic policy.

But there is one area where Obama could be transformative and bipartisan while helping both the middle class and the poor. He could show some leadership on the state of the black family, and the American family in general.

The thought came to me when a friend pointed me to a column by the Washington Post’s Courtland Milloy about how blacks are fleeing baseball at an alarming rate. Today only 8% of the baseball players are black. In 1959, black participation was more than twice as high at 17%. In 1975, the high-water mark, the rate was 27%.

The reasons for the decline are many and controversial, but one cited by Milloy is that baseball is a game taught by fathers, while basketball and football are more often taught by peers in pickup games.

Gerald Hall Jr., the director of a youth baseball program in Washington, told Milloy: “If you did a survey, I believe you’d find that the one thing average and above-average players have in common is a father. Baseball is, at heart, a father-and-son sport. And if you’re a kid that has nobody to throw to, nobody to talk to, nobody to discipline you in the way that baseball demands, you’re not likely to play the game.”

This struck me as more poignant than the usual bleak statistics about the black family. And they are bleak. About 70% of black kids are born out of wedlock. The out-of-wedlock birthrate for whites (29%) is now higher than what it was for blacks (24%) when Daniel Patrick Moynihan issued his (in)famous 1965 report, “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action.”

Although it’s certainly true that the kids of some single parents can do very well, particularly if those solo parents have the financial or social resources to carry the load (just look at Obama’s own childhood), it is also the case that as a generalization, kids from single-parent homes do worse. In other words, it may be better to have one good parent than two bad parents, but it’s indisputably better to have two good parents.

Put aside the arguments about traditional “family values,” the simple fact is that two parents who wait to have kids will have more time and money to invest in their kids, and the kids will benefit as a result. Single moms with two jobs don’t have time to play catch with, or teach the infield fly rule to, their kids.

The decline of marriage among low- and middle-income Americans is a crisis afflicting all ethnicities. But among prosperous whites, marriage is doing pretty well. And the evidence has steadily mounted that marriage is a big source of that prosperity.

Fewer than 1 in 10 births to college-educated women happen outside of wedlock, according to the group Child Trends, while for women with high school degrees or less, the number is close to 6 out of 10.

As Richard Ralph Banks demonstrates in “Is Marriage for White People?,” the same cannot be said of blacks. Contrary to widespread perceptions, marriage is not all that popular among middle- and upper-class blacks either. Black women, Banks reports, long for traditional family structures, but black men — even college-educated black men — for a variety of complex reasons are more ambivalent about it.

As Moynihan learned, speaking honestly about the state of the black family is politically explosive, even when done with the best of intentions. But if there is one person in America with the moral and political standing to have a transformative and beneficial impact on that conversation, it’s Barack Obama, a dedicated father and the most successful black man in American history.

Nixon went to China. Maybe Obama can go to black America for something more than votes every four years.

more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/11/21/obama_could_show_leadership_on_state_of_black_families_116223.html

  Cockroach’s Everywhere

BOSTON (CBS) – Two women have been placed on unpaid leave from their jobs after their photo at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia angered thousands of people on Facebook.

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/11/20/facebook-photo-of-plymouth-woman-at-tomb-of-the-unknowns-sparks-outrage/

Hillary Clinton for president? The drumbeat begins

“We will be back in Iowa for Hillary in 2016!” my friend Terry Cosgrove, president and CEO of Personal PAC, emailed the other day.

The wheels of the next presidential cycle are beginning to turn, and legions of Hillary Clinton acolytes are gearing up.

Indeed, the former first lady and U.S. senator is uniquely positioned for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/washington/16432254-452/hillary-clinton-for-president-the-drumbeat-begins.html

Killing the Goose

by Thomas Sowell

Corporation employee unions have killed the companies that provide their jobs. But the nation dies harder, and government unions profit.

Killing the goose that lays the golden egg is one of those old fairy tales for children which has a heavy message that a lot of adults should listen to. The labor unions which have driven the makers of Twinkies into bankruptcy, potentially destroying 18,500 jobs, could have learned a lot from that old children’s fairy tale.

Many people think of labor unions as organizations to benefit workers, and think of employers who are opposed to unions as just people who don’t want to pay their employees more money. But some employers have made it a point to pay their employees more than the union wages, just to keep them from joining a union.

Why would they do that, if it is just a question of not wanting to pay union wages? The Twinkies bankruptcy is a classic example of costs created by labor unions that are not confined to paychecks.

more: http://spectator.org/archives/2012/11/21/killing-the-goose

Media Malpractice:

Limbaugh is right – Idiot “Consultants are nuts!

more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/randy-hall/2012/11/20/limbaugh-slams-rinos-who-demand-gop-abandon-rushs-dream-journal

Not a Limbaugh fan by any means. But these two idiots are enough to make me puke!

Worth A Glance:

Hotels and Hassles

by Thomas Sowell

link: http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2012/11/21/creators_oped/page/full/

Clyburn: GOP using racial code words to criticize Ambassador Rice

link: http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/20/clyburn-gop-using-racial-code-words-to-criticize-ambassadorrice/

The Only Clear Road Back for Republicans

link: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/the_only_clear_road_back_for_republicans.html

Quote For Today:

Edward R. Murrow “Our major obligation is not to mistake slogans for solutions.”  ―    Edward R. Murrow

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s